Mindjack - Daily Relay

Read Mindjack Film
Fresh thinking on current and classic cinema

 the beat of digital culture
home | archives | about us | feedback
Advertise in Mindjack
Email for Information

special section:
Mindjack Film
Fresh thinking on current and classic cinema

shop:
T-Shirts
Coffee Mugs
Support Mindjack

Google
Web
Mindjack

Mindjack Release
Sign up to receive details of new issues


Subscribe with Bloglines

Archives:
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005

Links:

Technorati Profile

daily relay

suggest a story: relay@mindjack.com

Friday, February 28, 2003

DRM: Felten and Lessig
DRM conference continuing in the afternoon:

    Ed Felten gives a talk on “DRM, Black Boxes, and Public Policy”.

    Main assertions: DRM must be a black box (i.e., "secure execution environment," "appliance," "robustness"), created by technology and law. However, if that black boxing is backed by laws than ban analysis or tinkering, public debate about DRM policy is crippled by not being able to understand how it works.


    There are many claims about information policy which require research, being able to look inside the black box in order to inform debate.
    Examples: TIA (defenders claim its DRM can prevent abuses); porn blocking, filtering (defenders: block lists are accurate, protected by DRM); e-voting (defenders: there will be no tampering, DRM prevents it).



    Lawrence Lessig then speaks to “Binary Blindness”.

    He argues for an arc of different copyright authorization desires, from those who shared all freely ("none"), who who want some mix of protections ("some"), and those who desire total control ("all"). What happened since the Web was a sudden shift from the none's to the all's, a swing of extremes that address very few users' desires.

    Turning to campaigns for IP reform, Lessig described himself as “[i]ncreasingly convinced that working through courts and Congress won’t work in time”.
    Hence the shift to launch the Creative Commons. This is a form of DRE, digital rights expression. This allows all users to set their desired levels of content control, allowing a focus not on management but on expression. This has the advantage of being able to be done now. Example: Doctorow's Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, whose combination of hardcover release and Web publication reflects the author's desire for content expression.

    Brief note: after the Eldred fight, an opposing attorney found Lessig opposing “ideals and principles [against] all the money in the world”. We can move away from those horrendous odds by “Reclaim[ing] the internet through voluntary efforts… and expressions that show we mean it.”

:: posted by Bryan, 6:28 PM |

Buy a Text Ad Here
home | about us | feedback