Exactly one year (less a day) after his death, many of Marlon Brando's possessions are now up for auction at Christie's. So, if you happen to have $20 000 or so lying around, you may want to bid on his original Godfather script. Gauze-stuffing for cheeks not included.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/30/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |

In the hype leading up to War of the Worlds, it's probably only right for us to give Orson Welles his due as the first popularlizer of H.G. Wells' seminal science fiction novel. There are so many myths about his 1938 radio drama adaptation of War of the Worlds that teasing out reality can be a little tricky. For example, it wasn't a Halloween prank (the broadcast was actually on October 30), it was thoroughly in keeping with Welles' pioneering style of radio drama (not a purposeful attempt to trick the entire nation) and Welles (despite his denial the next day) knew exactly what he was doing. Orson's radio work is the subject of a new book by my friend and colleague Paul Heyer called The Medium and the Magician, and in it, this radio broadcast is placed (finally) in its correct historical and cultural context.
The broadcast came at a time when America was gripped by fear (sound familiar), fear of some intanglible invading power that threatens civilization (hmmm... sounding even more familiar) and the electronic media had the ability to play the emotions of the population pretty much like a fine-tuned instrument. In today's world of orange alerts and CNN's breathless coverage of the latest fist-pumping speech from their President, the story is even more timely (which probably was a deciding factor in Steven Spielberg's push to make the upcoming movie re-make).
War of the Worlds was not Orson's best radio work, but it was his most well-known. Luckily, there's a website where you can hear just about all of it, so decide for yourself.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Tuesday, June 28, 2005

In some ways, watching this brilliant 2000 film again is a lot like watching a nature video, if only because the behavior it depicts is so primal, so pure. Patrick Bateman (played in a career-making turn by Christian Bale) is an upcoming wall street executive in the 1980s who is dead at his core. Nothing excites him, as he says in the voiceover, "I can feel nothing but greed and disgust". His need to feel some kind of real emotion is fueled initially by an excess of image (including a morning bathing ritual that makes a supermodel seem like trailer trash in comparison), but later evolves into ritualized gruesome murder, set to a parade of 80s hits. His desperate struggle to connect with some kind of genuine emotion, find some person inside this hollow corporate shell, is both fascinating and deeply disturbing.
If that makes it sound like a slasher movie, don't be fooled. It's a sly, knowing film that actually comes across with a great deal of wit and black humour. The source novel was criticized heavily upon release for being anti-female (most of Bateman's victims are women), but this is a simplistic and reactionary reading. At least through the cinematic filter, this is an exploration and criticism of eighties urban culture, knowing and clever, told with intelligence and imagination.
The recent special edition DVD release contains numerous special features, including a new, nice-looking anamorphic transfer, a solid Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack, audio commentary with director Mary Harron (a Canadian!) and a few great little documentaries concerning the book, the film and their impact. (Among the neat tidbits here is the revelation that the movie originally starred Leonardo DeCaprio and was to be directed by Oliver Stone.)
Stay away from the wretched direct-to-video sequel (with William Shatner) and enjoy a provokative look at post-modern American moral culture.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Matt, 6/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Monday, June 27, 2005

:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/27/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Saturday, June 25, 2005

Comics artist Ivan Brunetti has assembled an image gallery of mostly silent-era actresses. One of Dolores Costello's portraits is seen here. Neat!
:: posted by Matt, 6/25/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Friday, June 24, 2005
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/24/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/24/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/24/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Thursday, June 23, 2005

:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/23/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
:: posted by Matt, 6/22/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |

I was surprised to learn recently that the Bounty had a tortured and painful gestation, which may explain why it was under-promoted and generally forgotten upon release. It was originally developed as the project that would re-unite masterful writer Robert Bolt (Lawrence of Arabia, Doctor Zhivago) with director David Lean (well.... same as above...). It was conceived variously as a two-parter, or one 3 1/2-hour epic. This is probably what attracted the A-list cast, but for reasons that remain unclear, the situation unravelled, and journeyman director Roger Donaldson (who recently helmed the skillful Thirteen Days) was brought in to shoot a version of the film from a heavily edited Bolt script. Neither Bolt nor Lean were happy with this result, and would not work together again. (Bolt went on to write The Mission and Lean directed A Passage to India before they both passed away.)
Why do I know this story? Because the British DVD edition of the film is loaded with extras that discuss it, including commentary tracks, a contemporary documentary and other special features of which the film is deserving. This is unlike the Canadian and American DVD (commonly called "region one") that contains nothing but a reasonable transfer of the film itself.
A shame - why did the Brits get a spectacular product while we got a bare-bones release? Probably because someone in the marketing department at MGM saw the film, as many did, as a cheap failure from the early 80s, instead of the effective and dramatic piece it is. Let's hope they find the error of their ways soon and give this movie the attention it deserves.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/22/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
Tuesday, June 21, 2005

:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/21/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |
Of course, it would be far more artistically meaningful to survey a director's body of work than an actor's, but that's the cineaste in me...
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/21/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Monday, June 20, 2005
:: posted by Matt, 6/20/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Another day in the life of a movie star, I guess.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/20/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/20/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Sunday, June 19, 2005
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/19/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Friday, June 17, 2005
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/17/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Matt, 6/17/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/17/2005 | Comments (3) Links to this post |
For your average movie ticket in Canada, it's around $10. Then about $5 for popcorn and possibly another $3 for a drink. That's roughly $18 per person, making a romantic night at the movies for two come up to a whopping $36. For that price, you get 20 minutes of commercial messages before a movie, no privacy and probably an uncomfortable chair.
For around $5 (total), you can rent a DVD to watch at home. Presuming, as many people now do, you have a true 5.1 surround sound system installed, and perhaps even a 16:9 television monitor, the picture and sound experience is at least comparable, if not better. You can skip the commercials, sit on your own couch, have a nice glass of wine and even pause the movie for bathroom breaks (or other romantic interludes, should the spirit move you...). (Heck - for around $20 - still cheaper than a night at the movies - you can OWN the DVD.)
You also get to choose the film, which may not be something that a theatre would show.
My question is - why is anyone surprised?
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/17/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |
Thursday, June 16, 2005
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/16/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Also announced for individual DVD releases are: Dracula A.D. 1972, Demon Seed, Night of the Lepus, Private Parts (1972), A Stranger Is Watching.
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/15/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |

[Via Cinematical]
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/15/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
We're still looking for more contributors though, so if you're interested in joining us just drop me an email and I'll fill you in on the details.
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/15/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |

Batman Begins opens today, and by all accounts the latest Batman film is dark and stylish, patterned more after Blade Runner than anything from DC Comic land (Frank Miller notwithstanding). The inside joke is, of course, that Blade Runner (and Ridley Scott's earlier masterpiece, Alien) had its roots in the enormously influential and stylish French comic, "Metal-Hurlant" (marketed in the US under the name "Heavy Metal"). A comic-influenced film influencing a film based on a comic... it boggles the mind.
More than that, it's clearly no longer a badge of shame to be a comic book fan. Heck - if Christopher Nolan, Robert Rodriguez, Samuel L. Jackson and Ridley Scott are all confessed comic nuts, they can't be that bad. Comics are getting their revenge at last.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/15/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
I had a quick look around the other offers and noticed a distinct trend. All those films that so many laboured on for years, now offered at bargain bin prices. Some have slipped out of copyright and into the hands of low-cost distributors, others have simply fallen under the radar for too many years. Either way, the cost of DVD's is on the way down, and fast. It wasn't that long ago that collectors like me were paying $30 for a VHS copy (albeit a letterboxed one) of any number of films. Now $30 is expensive for a DVD, a much better technology.
It makes me both optimistic and nervous. The ownership cost of DVD is sinking to a point where the next technology (probably some kind of HD format) is looming on the horizon. I'm sure I'll have to buy Blade Runner again in five years. Oh, well. Such is the life of a cineaste.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/15/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/14/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Monday, June 13, 2005
:: posted by Matt, 6/13/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/13/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
So, now there is only one major theatre chain left in this country. The need for independent theatres has never been more pressing. These organizations do exist (they usually market themselves as "film clubs", and require a small membership fee), but they're essentially the only way anyone in this country is going to be able to see anything other than the major Hollywood dreck.
Case and point: I live in a small town, and we have one theatre with five cinemas. At the moment, there are essentially no films there worth seeing (Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith excepted, of course), nor are there likely to be. They systematically avoid playing any movies for "grown-ups" and instead play whatever garbage the marketing machine forces down the pipeline. It was three months before they finally consented to showing "Farenheit 9/11" last year, and there were many other good films (with built-in politically/artistically-minded adult audiences) that they pass on.
I fear this kind of thing will happen more and more often, so get out there and start your own film clubs before it's too late. One last reasont to fear corporate control over film: when's the last time you saw a Canadian movie in a Canadian cinema?
I rest my case.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/13/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |
Saturday, June 11, 2005
Time and time again, Hollywood sabotages its own success by presuming the idiocy of its audience. Sad to say, it's always been thus, and I fear it will always be thus. It seems the myth of Hollywood is no truer than any of the others.
For true greatness, one has to look beyond Hollywood - not necessarily far beyond (there are still great American movies). Try checking out some Canadian films. Or even those European flicks. Go ahead. It's good for you.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/11/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Friday, June 10, 2005
[via DVDAnswers.com]
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/10/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
The new release date is February of 2006.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/10/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Thursday, June 09, 2005
:: posted by Matt, 6/09/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
Any comments?1. Tokyo Story
Japan, 1953, Yasujiro Ozu
2. La Regle du Jeu
France, 1939, Jean Renoir
3. Lawrence of Arabia
GB, 1962, David Lean
4. The Godfather Trilogy
US, 1972, 1974, 1990, Francis Ford Coppola
5. The Seven Samurai
Japan, 1954, Akira Kurosawa
6. Citizen Kane
US, 1941, Orson Welles
7. Raging Bull
US, 1980, Martin Scorsese
8. Vertigo
US, 1958, Alfred Hitchcock
9. Some Like It Hot
US, 1959, Billy Wilder
10. 8 1/2
Italy, 1963, Federico Fellini
[via The IFC Blog]
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/09/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |

Douglas Fairbanks and Errol Flynn were Hollywood's first infamous hell-raisers, running through women and wrecking hotel rooms, but always performing when the job called for it. They were followed by Orson Welles (probably the world's first high-profile hotel-wrecker for a spree in New York in the 30's) and then by inneumerable rock stars in the 60's and 70's. Three of my favourite actor/personalities, Richard Harris, Oliver Reed and Peter O'Toole were also as famous for their drinking and brawling. (Harris was once found riding the luggage carousel in Heathrow, passed out; Reed died in a drinking and armwrestling contest with Maltese sailors, and O'Toole, among other things, was arrested in Casablanca for making a spectacle in a bar celebrating the end of Lawrence of Arabia.) It's telling that Richard Harris and Crowe actually shared the screen near the end of the former's career, in Gladiator. Their scenes had an extra layer of meaning for me, as I saw the torch being passed.
Of course, it would have all been for naught had these men not been superb in front of the camera, which they must assuredly were. In today's world of sanitized, green tea-drinking scientologist stars, it's refreshing to know that some celebrities are still impatient with the constraints of their world. I for one welcome Crowe's bad behavior and hope it continues. Someone needs to keep being famous fun.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/09/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/08/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |

What was on their mind was sex, drugs, rock and roll and above all, freedom. Freedom in every imaginable way - freedom from reality, from the demands of the economy, from the demands of family and particularly freedom from what they saw as outdated moral codes. The Graduate character of Benjamin (played by Dustin Hoffman) is young, but not free. Mrs. Robinson, on the other hand, is.
"Freedom, man - that's what it's all about," was to become a rallying cry a couple of years later in Easy Rider, but Anne Bancroft was way ahead of them. Her confident sexuality reflects, probably for the first time in a hit movie, the underlying reality of 1950s America. Women were bored - their workaholic husbands ignored them, and ignored their needs and they were given little or no opportunity to develop individual lives. Mrs. Robinson shattered all that, acting out "free" in a truly sixties way. If, by the end of the movie, she has turned into the enemy, it's only because she has freed Benjamin to realize his own possibilities. The final scene of The Graduate shows the young couple riding off into the turbulent but exciting future of the 1960s.
Anne Bancroft's performance in the film is key - and she hits exactly the right tone of confidence and sexuality. I can't imagine anyone else in the role (although it has been re-created on stage by a number of actresses). It's such a potent image of the times, and all times, particularly now that America is sliding back into purile fundamentalist moralism. Even though, by all accounts, Ms. Bancroft would have rather been remembered for other things, the ultimate symbol of cultural freedom isn't that bad.
Here's to you.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/08/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |

[via GreenCine Daily]
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/08/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/08/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Tuesday, June 07, 2005

One of the great myth makers of a different kind of west was Sergio Leone, who, as the most artistically and commercially important of the "Spaghetti Western" directors, interpreted the west in a uniquely European way. Now things have come full circle with an exhibit at the Museum of the American West containing history and memorabilia from Leone's western films, which include A Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Leone also made what many (including myself) consider to be the ultimate western: Once Upon a Time in the West.
With costumes from his movies, special multimedia features and a treasure trove of exhibit items, this kind of thing makes me wish I lived in LA.
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/07/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/07/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Matt, 6/07/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Of course, Billy Bob isn't the first aspiring film great to have his career get lost in a maze of fame and infamy, just look at Stallone, who was once hailed as the new Brando. (Heck - look what happened to Brando!)
:: posted by Ian Dawe, 6/07/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Monday, June 06, 2005
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/06/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/06/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Friday, June 03, 2005

Roeg: On The Man Who Fell To Earth, we had a scene where David Bowie first arrives on Earth and walks into town; it's completely empty, things blowing. I couldn't believe this, but there was a children's fairground, with a big bouncy clown thing bouncing around. We had David cross the road and we followed him from behind, and this bouncing clown lost its cables and started bouncing towards him. I looked sideways, and there was a man who'd been lying in one of these torpedoes in a fairground ride. He staggered out of the torpedo towards David and kind of belched in front of him. And that was Mr Newton's first contact with human beings. Fantastic. He was completely baffled. I used that belch at the end too. You can't write that stuff in. So I shoot a lot of stuff. I think that's probably come from not having gone to film school. Things work themselves out. You've lost the showmanship thing, the fairground barker, come-see-what's-inside aspect of film-making when you try to plan everything for the audience.[via GreenCine Daily]
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/03/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
:: posted by Donald Melanson, 6/03/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
Thursday, June 02, 2005
:: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 6/02/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |
:: posted by Matt, 6/02/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
:: posted by Matt, 6/01/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Subscribe to our RSS feed: |
![]() ![]() ![]() |