| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Matt Hinrichs, 4/29/2005 | Comments (3) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/29/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Thursday, April 28, 2005
Some rumor mills have begun to circulate that Pierce Brosnan is out and Daniel Craig is in as the next James Bond. I had the opportunity to sit down with Mr. Craig to discuss his new movie Layer Cake and I asked him about Bond. He said that he has never been officially approached about such a thing and that, if he were, he's not sure he would accept. How do I know he was telling the truth? "If I were doing it, I wouldn't be allowed to talk about it," he said.
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Matt Hinrichs, 4/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/28/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Wednesday, April 27, 2005
| :: posted by Matt Hinrichs, 4/27/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/27/2005 | Comments (2) Links to this post |
Convoluted as they were, the first two Mission: Impossible films benefited from crisp, beautifully stylized direction by Brian De Palma and John Woo, respectively. For the third film, the producers flirted with David Fincher, which would have been great, and with Joe Carnahan, who did the stylish, overrated Narc, which would have been okay, but they settled on some guy named J.J. Abrams, a TV director. Likewise, the third X-Men film has lost series helmer Bryan Singer to rookie Matthew Vaughn (the producer of Snatch). I smell Part 3 stinkbombs, not unlike The Matrix Revolutions, in the air.
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/27/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Cinema Confidential reports that Judi Dench ("M") recently told the New York Post that, despite rampant rumors to the contrary, Pierce Brosnan will in fact return as James Bond in Casino Royale, to be directed by GoldenEye's Martin Campbell. Personally, I think Brosnan would be far better than any of the rumored future Bonds (save maybe Clive Owen, though it's unlikely he'd take the job). What would have been really fantastic though, is if they could have gotten John Boorman (The Tailor of Panama, Point Blank) to direct it.
| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/27/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
If you've ever wondered how much better a Hitchcock movie would be if only Michael Bay could have somehow been involved in it, you'll soon get your answer. As Ain't it Cool News reports, his production company, Platinum Dunes, is going ahead with a remake of Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds. And that's not all. As one of the talkbackers on AICN points out, there's also a remake of Hitchcock's 1951 classic Strangers on a Train (an even better film than The Birds) in the works. But IMDb doesn't list anyone as being attached to the project at the moment, so there's still some hope that this ridculously bad idea will be ditched before it gets any further.
| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/26/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Since there's no way I could do this myself, I've called on a couple of great writers and peerless film geeks to join me in this seat-of-the-pants endeavor -- you'll see a few of their posts below already. Jeffrey M. Anderson is a freelance film critic who's work appears in the San Francisco Examiner and the Las Vegas Weekly, among other publications. He's also the man behind the long-running and always excellent Combustible Celluloid website. You may know our other regular contributor, Matt Hinrichs, better by his nom de blog, Scrubbles. And if you've read his site, you know he has a wide-ranging and eclectic taste in movies, and always has something to say about them.
We also still have room for a couple more contributors. If you're as comfortable talking about Roger Corman and George Romero as you are discussing Fellini and Godard then you're the type of person we're looking for. Send a few sample posts and a brief bit of information about yourself to: editor@mindjack.com and we'll go from there.
| :: posted by Donald Melanson, 4/26/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Monday, April 25, 2005
The Guardian has published a list of the 40 best directors, culled from a poll of seven critics (including Molly Haskell, Derek Malcolm and my friend B. Ruby Rich). The list is a bit odd. It goes out of its way to include lots of great international directors that might not be household names, such as Abbas Kiarostami (#6), Bela Tarr (#13), Tsai Ming-liang (#18), Aki Kaurismaki (#19), Michael Haneke (#22), Alexander Sokurov (#26) and Samira Makhmalbaf (#36). But it also contains some serious stretches. Steven Soderbergh comes in at #4; it's arguable he should be on the list at all. He's made three near-great films (sex, lies and videotape, Out of Sight and The Limey), several overrated behemoths and no great ones. Other overrated directors on the list include Michael Winterbottom (#20), Walter Salles (#23), Ang Lee (#27), David O. Russell (#34) and the Wachowski Brothers (#35). Could the makers of the abominable The Matrix Revolutions really be considered in the top 40? On the plus side, David Lynch comes in at #1, and the list had the good grace to consider David Cronenberg (my personal #1) at #9. Even the great animator Hayao Miyzaki earned a slot in the top ten. I guess the ultimate point of such a list is to liven up discussions, and they certainly have done that.
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/25/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/25/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/25/2005 | Comments (1) Links to this post |
| :: posted by Jeffrey M. Anderson, 4/25/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
Sunday, April 24, 2005
| :: posted by Matt Hinrichs, 4/24/2005 | Comments (0) Links to this post |
| Subscribe to our RSS feed: |
|



